OZEMPOID GOVERNMENT

Government as if People Matter

Can the whole South African government be replaced by a single person? I would like the job. Especially if it comes with the combined salaries of all the people currently doing the job.

It is sobering to think that Jan Hofmeyr handled six portfolios concurrently during WWII while Smuts was overseas engaging with Churchill, Roosevelt and Truman, and wtih the militaries of Montgomery, Eisenhower and Stalin. It was not good for Hofmeyr. He is thought to have died young from burnout as a result of that wartime overload. True or not, we have to agree that things were different. In Hofmeyr time, we had only a few million people, and government truly only concerned itself with a minority.

From that tiny tax base, they nonetheless built thousands of kilometres of roads and rail routes, tunnels, bridges, harbour and energy infrastructure, to serve both farmers and business. Their successors were likewise industrious with infrastructure, whereas our current government has worked tirelessly to undo all of it. Forget white guilt: I would not like to be in the shoes of our majority, looking back on their leadership's puny achievements in thirty years. There will not be much to sing about, except for Shilowa's Gautrain, and he defected to Cope!

I do think that Smuts and Jan Hofmeyr would be disgusted at how feebly we work these days. They would also hose themselves with laughter at what cowards we are, cowering in blue light cavalcades. Smuts used to take solitary hikes up Table Mountain from his residence. Come on, CR, have a go!

My sister often said "Women who seek to emulate men lack ambition", so I may as well forget the top job. Seriously, though, the US has 50 statees. The GDP of California alone is more than that of the entire continent of Africa, so why should one person not manage our smallernyana government? With respect to my sister, will SHE please stand up? Thuli? Mandisa? Come on up!

A 32-Minister Cabinet is sure to end in a mess. Through the years, many books on management, written by the whole spectrum from hatchet man hirer-firers to industry nice guys caution against large numbers of decision makers. About management itself, who can forget The Peter Principle, nor Parkinson's Law? EF Schumacher believed that any enterprise of less than 360 people should not even need a manager. Discussing the ideal number of members on a board, one author found that 9 was the most effective. For any membership exceeding 9, the board became proportionally less effective.

Chainsaw Politics

I completely agree with Rob Hersov in a Biznews video, (and probably a whole generation of businessmen) on lean boards. Cabinets are decision panels just as boards of directors are: "The more the messier". How thirty plus people can even keep track of what they all decide will take enough time to outmode whatever they said. More is less. Hersov says Javier Milei slashed his cabinet from 18 to 8, then added one: a Ministry of Deregulation, the post he avers he would desire.

People First

At one stage, the ANC government was big on the phrase Batho Pele: People First. They, as we know, practise party first. I think there should be only one portfolio in the cabinet, called "People First" it can comprise Defence, Energy, Transport, Health and Education, and those should each need only a director. Those are the only things government needs to provide for the good of people. The rest is for them to butt out of and stay away. If you think those portfolios are too much for one person to handle, you may be right.

What to Slash?

UIM's Niel de Beer thinks all SOEs should be bundled into one portfolio and handled by a single competent person. Perhaps, since these are mere corporations rather than fully blown government departments, that could work. With all the technical advancements we have today, and if the US can govern with 26 in the cabinet, for 340 million people, we should manage fine with a maximum of five. I still think we should cope fine with one and a deputy. We can outwork those yankees any time. Just ask Elon Musk.

If it's too hard, we're doing it wrong

We have a solid thirty years showcasing that. It is too hard, and they are doing it all wrong. I agree with Hersov that Sports and Women have no place in parliament: the current minister has exposed rampant corruption in the former, and the latter? As Hersov asks: "What do they do?" I have a feeling that sports and women would do better out of government. We did not have a Department Against Apartheid, yet we still got rid of apartheid. Think about that! Boxing was once the only world championship we held. How is Mzansi boxing doing thanks to the ministry? The US,the richest country in the world, has no sports ministry and they clean up the meadals at every Olympics.

Pansi AmaPati, Pansi

I agree with OHM on scrapping provincial government, along with their own and other political parties. Presently, parites are not known for talent: rather for school-level debate: one party's pre-election promise was to open health clinics 24/7, saying kleva crap like "We are allowed to get sick only during working hours". They clearly have no idea how health care unions will react, for a start, let alone finding the staff and the money for extra shifts.

As for parties, the government gives big money to them: Two Hundred Million Rand is about the going rate. Now wonder there are nearly thirty of them! FF van Zyl Slabbert, in a private conversation, revealed that the majority of MP's realise that they need do nothing but sit tight for two parliamentary terms to earn a parliament pension for the rest of their lives. Now you know why the place is packed with talentless drones thunderously bursting out of their clothes from free tea and cakes in endless plenary sessions. They are dozing their time away, waiting to collect their public ibonsela. Phakamisa Mayaba has written about ex-MP's, reluctant to vacate parliament village, even though they have been shown the door by their parties.

Who wants to even dwell on how eye-watering is the cost of nine separate parliaments? Just getting rid to the blue light cavalcades alone will save billions. The bigger things are, the slower they work. On a local level, as long as local is not hobbled by national, things can get done fairly quickly. You are in for a very thin time if you try to persuade a Howick resident from any group there that local government fails, with a mayor like Chris Pappas at the helm.

NHI

Public Health is a number one priority. There is no sense in waiting for pandemics to school us on that again. In our current system, health is provincial, not national. I know this from bitter experience, as will be read below. I don't knock good admin. I was an admin donkey for enough of my life to know how dysfunctional poor admin can render any entity, but admin needs vision, not blinkers. Good service delivery is not seen as good, or interesting. It is seen as a right. Government has one job: to share the money out better. That is purely about tax. Cutting waste helps. but it has to be the right waste. Too much is grabbed before it ever reaches the poor. Am I saying we must cut government people? Yes, I am. The top cats, not the bottom ones.

I agree in principle with the need for free healthcare. I think anything less is (pandemic) false economy, but most of us have trust issues with the NHI Bill. It is thought to be merely a planned party feeding trough, more fleecing of the public.

Rudderless Healhcare

People have immediate concerns. Clean audits are an indicator of well-run institutions, but they do not place operational efficiency in the picture. In the same way as old SAR was best designed and run by engineers, and subsequently ruined by MBAs, hospitals need to be run by medics, not by accountants. My considerable experience of public health, attending clinics and hospitals for 15 years, has revealed that most are rudderless, with little or no leadership. When I asked a nursing sister, she pursed her lips, and then said "Hulle ry lekker in hul blink karre". No wonder we faltered against COVID. We did not do badly, but nor did we shine. Our most glaring problem, especially given global realities, is that our health system is run province by province. Talk about the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing.

Health Care by Province

Some data is captured and made available nationally, but it is woefully inadequate in places. Helen Joseph Hospital has hundreds of PCs lying idle: appointments are made in hard cover A4 ledger books, 1900s style. They do make it work, but my experience in George and local Garden Route clinics is that computing and SMS reminders work better. If there were any real leadership at HJH, promotion would be impossible without computer literacy.

For one example, after hours of queues, at Helen Joseph Hospital, the screening for my eye treatment was with a difficult, unhappy and combative young blonde female who was determined to reject me if at all possible.

She started by asking for my address, averring that I was surely not in the hospital's intake area, then flatly rejected the optometrist letter diagnosing cataracts. I had to keep a very cool head to resist a fight and keep focussed to get tested. Tests confirmed the optomtrist's findings, and I was given a date 18 months later for the procedure.

Then, circumstances forced my relocation from Jhb. My next of kin, on whom I depend, moved to the Garden Route and I followed shortly, after waiting out 15 of the 18 months for eye care. Phoning HJH, my request to get the appointment transferred to George Hospital drew a brusque "I don't know what you are talking about" and the phone was slammed down. Charming.

I had to re-apply at Hoekwil Clinic. The first attempt failed: it was found six months later that no-one at George Hospital had phoned me to tell me my procedure date. I missed it, and had to re-apply. Luckily, the doctor was proactive. Pointing out that, at close to 80 years old, I feared going completely blind without being treated. He responded firmly, and I got a second date on the spot, proving it can be done, where there is will. There is no place for doing health province by province. In these high tech days, so much can be done easily with IT and phones. If Netcare can run clinics on phone software, so can amyone else. It is beginning here and there, but it needs a shove. If there were supervision, peope would not be skiving off at half day, as I have seen.

Honey, we shrunk the government!